logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013.9.26.선고 2013도9261 판결
가,특정범죄가중처벌등애관한법률위반(절도)나.사기
Cases

2013Do9261 A., Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny)

(b) Fraud;

Defendant

A

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney BS (Korean)

The judgment below

Daegu High Court Decision 2013/166 decided July 11, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

September 26, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court’s determination of conviction of all the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Do3898, Jun. 10, 201; Constitutional Court Decision 2006Hun-Ba94, Nov. 27, 2008; 2007Hun-Ba19, Nov. 27, 2008). In so doing, the lower court did not err by violating the Constitution or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the defendant’s right to defense and sentencing guidelines, etc.

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the ground of unfair sentencing may be filed only where the court below rendered a death penalty, an indefinite term, or an imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years. Thus, in this case where the defendant was sentenced to a more minor punishment, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Judges

Justices Park Sang-hoon

Justices Shin Young-young

Justices Kim Yong-deok

Justices Kim In-young

arrow