1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From March 30, 1983 to November 4, 191, and from March 21, 1992 to December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff served as an carbon source in the Dong-dong Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Small Company”).

B. As a result of the Defendant’s work imposing an burden on the Defendant for a long period of not more than 30 years at the Nonparty Company, the Plaintiff asserted that the “surrounding to the opposite party” occurred, and applied for medical care benefits on July 9, 2013 and received medical care approval from the Defendant on December 31, 2013. On January 21, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted an initial medical care benefit application to the Defendant for the “surrounding to the opposite party surgical surgical surgical surging, and the right surging surgical surging surgical surgical surgical surgical surgical surgical surging” and received medical care until February 28, 2015 after filing an application for additional medical care

(hereinafter referred to as the "instant approved injury and disease") by combining the above injury and disease approved as additional injury and disease; (c)

On March 26, 2015, the Plaintiff claimed that the instant injury and disease occurred by using a vibration device, such as Maambro, while working in the non-party company for 30 years on April 29, 2015, after receiving the diagnosis of the “Saambio-Ma” (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”), who was inside the Central University Hospital, and filed an initial medical care benefit application for the instant injury and disease.

On May 6, 2015, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition rejecting the Plaintiff’s first application for medical care benefits on the ground that “The instant injury or disease was diagnosed due to the same cause as the occupational branch of the recognition of the instant case, and the injury or disease already occurred due to the occupational accident is additionally discovered, and thus constitutes an application for medical care benefits for additional injury or disease.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-4 evidence, Eul 2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion (1) The plaintiff's assertion is accompanied by the revolving of the visit.