【Plaintiff’s Claim against Defendant B】

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. The facts of recognition [1] Around July 2009, the Plaintiff reported wages in arrears to the KNE branch with C, D, and E on the ground that the Plaintiff did not receive wages of 107,468,620 won from KND Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”)

On March 5, 2010, in the case of the Plaintiff, C, D, E, and C, C, C, C, C, 10,486,230 won to the Plaintiff, and D, 25,00,000 won to D, and 16,159,113,920 won to E, up to March 12, 2010, a notary public drafted a notarized deed of debt repayment contract No. 27, 2010 to the Plaintiff.

On June 3, 2010, the plaintiff, C, D, and E received a seizure and collection order as to the claim for the refund of the deposit against Suwon District Court 2010TTT 10982, which he had against the Kumidomina Corporation, and entered the executive title in the above notarial deed.

[2] The Daegu District Court deposited KRW 5859, 201, which was KRW 500,000,000, on the ground that the seizure of the claim for the return of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the Gumishion Co., Ltd. was concurrent, and reported on the grounds for the deposit on August 13, 201.

On November 14, 2011, the distribution procedure for the above deposit was in progress with the Suwon District Court FF distribution procedure, each of which was 10,486,230 won to C as the wage creditors of each of the first priority, and 25,000,000 won to D, E, and 16,159,070 won to E, and 6,096,802 won to Han Bank to each of the second priority provisional attachment or collection authorities, and 11,370,121 won to Defendant B, and 48,560,60,617 to the Defendant Credit Guarantee Fund, and 8,516,145 won to G, and 48,41,910 won to H, 6,408,475,79,7479,757,79,747,749,79,757,747,97, and 1481, to the Defendant C Co.

All of the creditors who reported the reasons for deposit shall be paid dividends to the former and the latter.