The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On July 14, 2015, the Defendant would have repaid the victim C at a new finite branch located in the Nam-gu Eup in the Republic of Korea-U.S., the Republic of Korea-U.S., the Republic of Korea (U.S.) around 14, 2015.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay, even if he borrowed money from the injured party, because the Defendant had a debt of KRW 2 billion at the time and had to repay the money borrowed from the injured party to another person.

On July 15, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained the delivery of KRW 50,000,000 to the national bank account in the name of D (Account Number E) from the victim.

B. On June 13, 2016, the Defendant continued to repay the amount of KRW 70 million to the victim at the same place, three months after he/she borrowed the amount to KRW 70 million.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant continued to pay the debt in 2015 and continued to reach approximately KRW 3.5 billion.5 billion, as seen above, there was no intention or ability to pay the debt even if he borrowed money from the damaged party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, obtained a total of KRW 70 million, including KRW 50 million around June 13, 2016, and KRW 20 million on June 15, 201, from the victim, and acquired it through the above national bank account.

2. On June 29, 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim F is required to pay money to the victim F at the point of the immediately south of the immediately south credit union.

The interest shall be paid in two copies per month on the loan of money and the refund shall be paid immediately if the loan is made.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay, even if he borrowed money from the injured party, since the Defendant had a debt of KRW 3.5 billion at the time, and was faced with the so-called “prohibitment” situation.

The Defendant is the victim.