logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.02.18 2015고단1568
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months for fraud in Busan District Court's Dong Branch, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 28, 2015.

1. The defrauded of the borrowed money is the victim E (F) operation “F” located in the D Motor Vehicle Trading Complex in Busan Seo-gu, Busan, and the Defendant shall pay the victim the money to the D Motor Vehicle Trading Company at the above F office around May 3, 2010, while the victim is obliged to pay the money to the F office at the above F office around May 3, 2010. However, if the victim borrowed KRW 40,000,000,000,000 per month, it will be paid every month more.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the debt according to the agreement, even if the debtor borrowed money from the injured party due to the situation where the debt amount was in excess of KRW 270 million at the time, and the debtor repaid the existing debt with the profits accrued every month.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the remittance of KRW 40,000 from the victim for the same day.

2. On May 24, 2010, the Defendant shall deposit the purchase price of vehicles with the victim at the above “F office” office around May 24, 2010, and then immediately deposit the sale price after the transfer of the purchase price to the victim.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, since there was a large amount of personal liabilities as above, and there was a situation in which the term "return" formula was used as the payment of existing debts and the operating expenses of the company, etc. for the sale of used vehicles, there was no intention or ability to deposit the price in accordance with the agreement even if it was sold after receiving the purchase price from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the remittance of KRW 17,360,00 from that day to that day as the purchase price of vehicles, and from that time until June 27, 2011, is attached crime sight list.

arrow