beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for eight months, respectively.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of road traffic law at the Jung-gu District Court on October 23, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence at Chuncheon Prison on July 27, 2015.
[2016 order 34]
1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed on July 27, 2015, Defendant A, in front of his house located in Gyeonggi-si in Gyeonggi-do, did not seem to have a good space between the Defendants due to the problem of house repair costs, etc.
Around July 30, 2015, F and his body fighting were accused of assault from F on or around the same day, and the F reported the F as a retaliation against it, such as the coercion of indecent act against Defendant B, who is a friendship of Defendant A, and the injury to Defendant A, with the intent to have the F punished.
Defendant
A, around July 2015, he proposed to Defendant B to “F as an indecent act against sexual intercourse.” On August 13, 2015, A called “F Hamb in G in the Hocheon-si, Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, and forced B to commit an indecent act against F son.”
Report to the effect that “” was made, and Defendant B received a report from Defendant A at his own house on August 17, 2015, and received the report from Defendant A, and received the report from Defendant B, and received “the police officer was sexually indecent act from F.”
After making a statement to the effect that ", at that place, there is a complaint stating that "F himself/herself was forced to commit an indecent act by force, such as singing him/herself over seven times from March 2015 to May 2015, 2015," and submitting it to the above police officers. On August 22, 2015, he/she was investigated by the police station located in the Macheon-si, Sincheon-si, Sincheon-si, Sincheon-si, the police officer belonging to the above police station, and made a statement to the above purport.
However, Defendant B did not have been subject to forced indecent act from the above F, and Defendant B was well aware that Defendant B did not have been subject to forced indecent act from the above F.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit the above F penal punishment.