Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

15,000,000 won respectively from A and B.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On February 4, 2015, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and four months and to three years of suspended execution on October 18, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 18, 2015.

[Criminal facts] 2016 Highest 6337 (Defendant A and B)

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime is obvious that at the office of G in the vicinity of F in Changwon-si around August 31, 2010, Defendant A and Defendant B “M” written indictment for the resolution of a dispute settlement council in the written indictment for the operation of the victim H is a clerical error in the “A dispute settlement council”.

In order to obtain a loan after offering it as security and to use it as a fund for shipbuilding machinery parts business, the victim must provide the Corporation I to the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund as security and get a loan of KRW 300 million in the name of the J entertainment expenses of the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund and supply KRW 30 million in the form of loans.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the defendant was thought to use money for personal purposes without using it as entertainment expenses even if he did not receive money from the injured party due to no special source of revenue at the time.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim, and received 30 million won from the victim to the account under the name of K as entertainment expenses, and received money and valuables for loan intermediation, which belongs to the duties of officers and employees of financial companies.

2. On December 3, 2010, Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant listens to the speech that the injured party seeks to operate the Nwa Holdings in the window L of the creative city at the original stage, and would have the injured party obtain a loan by receiving an appraisal at an early stage.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the defendant was thought to use money for personal purposes without using it as appraisal expenses even if there was no special revenue source at the time.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.