A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2011, the Defendant, who was a related person C, was a Korean national, but was a Japanese nationality, and had a false statement of property in Japan, and acquired money by deceiving the victim as if the victim was pregnant.

1. On March 14, 201, the Defendant, who is not a attorney-at-law defrauded, made a false statement that there is a need for legal costs, such as attorney-at-law appointment, in order to eliminate seizure, from the victim’s house located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant did not use money from the victim’s house of the victim in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and the head of a Tong whose 100 million won was deposited after being investigated by the

However, the fact was that there was only a debt amounting to KRW 130 million without any particular property at the time, and was not bad credit due to the lack of payment of medical insurance premiums, and even if there was no passbook depositing KRW 100 million, there was no intention to use it as attorney's appointment fee, and it was thought that it was used for personal debt repayment.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 23,00,000 to the bank account (E) of the name of the victim used by the Defendant from the victim, under the pretext of appointing the attorney.

2. Around March 30, 2011, the Defendant, who acquired the name of sanbu and the hospital expenses, was to be pregnant with the victim at the home of the above victim, and to conduct an inspection by the marbly, but the hospital expenses were to be changed and made a false statement.

However, the fact was not pregnant, and even if the victim received money from the victim, it was thought that the victim had no intention to use it as the hospital cost, such as the examination of the baby, and that it was used for the repayment of personal debt.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 4,00,000 won under the name of hospital expenses, such as the examination of a baby, from the victim on the same day from the victim to the bank account on the same day, and from around that time to March 9, 2012, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Form 1, shall be added up to 18 times in total under the name of a woman in childbed and a hospital expenses.