logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2015.12.15 2015고정81
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 6, 2015, the Defendant jointly with C is the victim D(44 years of age) and Si expenses in the Cheonggum music plaza, which is located in the 21stm of Namwon-si, Namwon-si around April 6, 2015.

B. The defendant A, with the lush floor of the victim, blicked the victim's breath with her blick with her hand at one time, and the defendant C combined with this, her face part of the victim's face once as a drinking, and her hand flicked the victim's breath with her hand, so the victim's breath in the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. A complaint (Evidence Nos. 2);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (related to the attachment of photographs on the upper part of the suspect), the investigation report (related to the on-site CCTV verification), and the investigation report (related to the additional verification ofCCTV);

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 2 (1) of the same Act concerning the Selection of Punishment of Violences, etc. and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is against the defendant; although the defendant is deemed to have agreed to the defendant smoothly with the victim, the crime of this case is committed again despite the fact that the defendant had already been punished several times due to violent crimes, despite the fact that the defendant again committed the crime of this case without any special reason, the defendant was able to take a bath to the victim and had assault first, and all other sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case are considered in light of all other sentencing conditions, it cannot be deemed that the amount of fine specified in the summary order of this case is heavy. Thus,

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow