logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.26 2018누50972
휴업급여부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the following contents among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is recognized in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

4. Each "this Court" shall be the "Court of First Instance" of the 4th 1, 2nd 1, 3, 7th 10th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3, 7th 2nd 2nd 3rd 2nd 3rd 2nd 3rd

9. On the 11st page “Non-Party Company did not receive” added “(in light of this, it is difficult to readily conclude that the Plaintiff was unable to work at all due to the aggravation of the injury and disease of this case by November 24, 2014).”

9. The term "receiving point" in 13 parallels shall be read as "receiving point".

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow