1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the reasoning of the judgment is justifiable in light of the following among the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the facts findings and determination of the court of first instance are just, even if the plaintiff submitted to this court Gap evidence Nos. 15 to 18, I testimony of the witness of the court of first instance, and the inquiry results of the fact-finding with respect to the JJ association of this court, and the judgment of the court of first instance is added unless there is any error as alleged by the plaintiff.

Therefore, it shall be quoted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 6th 7th 7th 8th 7th 7th 8th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th 2th 2006. The 2nd 8th 2nd 3th 3th 2006.

Each "Witness" of the 6th 12th 12th 6th 12th 8th 7th 7th 199.

Each "this Court" in the 7th parallel 2nd parallel 8th parallel 18th parallel 18th parallel 2th parallel 2th parallel 3th parallel 2th parallel 3th parallel.

9. The term "water treatment" in the 6th place shall be changed to "water treatment ICT".

The 9th 8th 2th 9th 2th 8th 2th 8th 201, “The Plaintiff alleged that the 1st th 8th 8th 2nd 8th 8th 8th 2nd 8th 2nd 8th 2nd 2nd 3th 2nd 8th 2nd 3th 2nd 3th 2nd 2006.”

After the 9th page 12, “(The Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit)” was added to “(the Plaintiff’s assertion that it did not constitute an unfair claim since it was claimed as an anti-scoping tool due to an anti-scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is this.