Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a new account in the name of the Defendant at the B B B B B C located in Daegu Northern-gu, Seoul, on July 25, 2018; (b) informed the name-based party of the said account number; and (c) moved from Daegu to Seoul on July 26, 2017 to the first place of the new wall.
On July 26, 2018, the person under whose name the victim made a telephone call to the victim E (the identification number: F) and misrepresenting the staff of the National Police Agency, and making a false statement that "the head of the passbook was connected with the one by the one in which the passbook was settled in small amount, so the Seoul Central District Prosecutor's Office should report it to the Seoul Central District Prosecutor's Office. In order to find out whether the money in the passbook was the source of fraud, the money in the passbook should be deposited in order to contact the Financial Supervisory Service, and then the money in the passbook was remitted to the above B account in the name of the defendant around 15:15 of the same day from the victim."
On the same day, at around 15:35, the Defendant released KRW 30 million, which the victim remitted, at the credit branch located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, according to the direction of the person without his name, and then delivered the withdrawal to the telecommunications-based financial fraud communication device, in which the name he was waiting in the vicinity of the outlet 6 in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.
Accordingly, the defendant aided and aided the act of fraud by making it easy for the defendant to commit the false names.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Documents and written statements of E;
1. The Defendant asserts that “The circumstances supporting the criminal intent of the Defendant of the victim’s cell phone details and the statement of transactions related to the deposit of damaged money,” and that “the Defendant committed an act identical to the facts stated in the judgment of the lower court, i.e., lending KRW 20 million on the basis of the fact that the person H, a lending business entity, withdraws commercial money from the account in the Defendant’s name and created the transaction performance.”