logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.09.27 2017가단5605
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Appointors D shall be KRW 2,00,000 and 5% per annum from May 27, 2008 to September 27, 2017, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The pertinent Plaintiff’s representative and auditor of the 103 Dong-dong council of occupants’ representatives (hereinafter referred to as the “representative council”) of the 103 Dong-dong I apartment complex in Gwangju Northern-gu (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”), and the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Defendants”) are the occupants of the instant apartment.

B. The representative conference and some occupants, including the Defendants, belonging to the Plaintiff in the course of conflict between the parties, were in conflict due to differences in opinions regarding the method of guarding the apartment of this case.

The circumstances are as follows.

(1) On January 13, 2004, LG Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “LG Construction”) and Kinger Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “KT”) concluded a mutual cooperation memorandum for the construction of the dispatch cost system of apartment buildings (including the apartment of this case) constructed and constructed by LG construction (including the apartment of this case) to the extent possible. The above letter of understanding applies to KT’s services to the extent possible when the apartment is sold to which LG Construction Co., Ltd.’s dispatch cost system applies, and KT purchases and installs apartment control equipment, etc.; however, the ownership of the installation, etc., other than control equipment, was transferred to the occupants.

On October 12, 2006, NF Co., Ltd. entered into a contract with KT for the use of the apartment house integrated security system in relation to the cost of the apartment in this case.

As an auditor of the representative meeting, the plaintiff argued that all facilities installed in the multi-family housing are included in the sale price regardless of the name of the facility, in which the KT included the equipment investment cost in calculating the cost of expenses, and pointed out on December 3, 2007 that the cost of the KT is insufficient and that there is a large amount of cost.

x) On the other hand, the representative meeting shall be around May 19, 2008.

arrow