1. The Defendants shall jointly:

A. It delivers each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiffs;

B. The plaintiff A;

On March 9, 2018, the Plaintiffs completed the registration of the transfer of co-ownership on each real estate listed in paragraphs 1 through 11 of the attached Table as stated below.

Attached Form

Attached Table No. 10.6616/37/37 5.9504/37 No. 21/10 9/10 9/10 9/10 9/10 9/10 535.4848486/46/4562 319.362 60.616/4562 60.60.616/37 616/37 95.37 64.74/37 74.72/472 57.572/462 80.616/810.616/84/8198/598/104/1010/19/100/19/100/19/19/10 of the real estate structures of the Plaintiff’s Schedule No. 10.219/10/19/10.

The Defendants are using each of the instant real estate as a site for the car page business and a building and a restaurant business, and possess and use it.

[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (Evidence with Serial Nos.), the same shall apply hereinafter.

According to the basic facts set out in Paragraph 1 of the judgment of delivery of each of the real estate of this case, the defendants are jointly obligated to deliver each of the real estate listed in Paragraphs 1 through 11 of the separate sheet to the plaintiffs, unless there are special circumstances.

(Plaintiffs are not minority right holders with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. However, as a preservation act of the jointly-owned property, the Defendants may claim the delivery of the jointly-owned property to the Defendants. The Defendants’ concluding a sales contract with G, the real estate seller listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 11 are invalid as a false declaration of intent, and accordingly, the separate sheet.