The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant is C Elementary School Security Guards.

On June 9, 2013, around 20:20, the Defendant demanded the victim E (the aged 35) (the aged 35) to leave the playground door from the school as it is necessary to open the playground door to the victim E (the aged 35) with children in South-gu C elementary school located in Nam-gu D at port.

At this time, E, who had son and her camp, resisted to the security guards, that “for the playground, many people are engaged in a campaign, and why they are called us,” and assaulted the victim by breaking the flab.

2. Determination

A. The establishment of facts constituting an offense in a criminal trial ought to be based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads a judge to have a reasonable doubt, insofar as the prosecutor’s proof does not sufficiently reach the extent that such conviction would lead to such a conviction, even if the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable, it should be determined in the interests of the defendant, even if there is doubt of guilt, such as the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable.

B. The evidence submitted to this court and duly admitted alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant first saw the breath of E and F, as shown in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

오히려 이 법원에 제출된 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, ① E은 피고인의 얼굴을 때리고 정강이 부분을 찼다는 이유로, F은 팔로 피고인의 어깨를 누르는 등 폭행하였다는 이유로 각 벌금 30만 원의 약식명령을 받아 그대로 확정된 점, ② E과 F은 피해자를 폭행한 사실이 없다고 지속적으로 부인하면서 피고인이 멱살을 잡아 그 손을 놓으라고만 하였다고 진술하여 위 확정된 약식명령의 내용에 배치되는 점, ③ 만 70세에 가까운 피고인이 30대인 E, F의 멱살을 모두 잡고 있었고 E, F이 이를 떼어내지...