The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) the fact at the 2nd apartment taxi stop in the Bupyeong-gu Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si on the 11:00 of October 10, 2015 that the victim C left the office of Kim Jong-si and set the disturbance at the seat of Kim Jong-si, and thereby damaging the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts at the seat of D, which is a Dong-gu taxi engineer, where he was located at the seat of the Dong-gu Kim Jong-si, although there was no fact that the victim C left the office of Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si and set up the taxi stop at the seat of the Dong-gu, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si.

2. The above crime is a crime falling under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. Since it is recognized that the victim submitted an application not to punish the defendant on March 11, 2016, which was after the instant indictment, to the effect that he/she does not want to punish the defendant, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.