beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On February 11, 2015, the Busan District Court sentenced two years of imprisonment to commit a crime of fraud and a violation of the Labor Standards Act, and four months of imprisonment to commit a violation of the Labor Standards Act. On December 15, 2016, the court terminated the execution of the sentence in the third prison of North Korea North Korea.
Defendant
A is a member of the D Workers' Union belonging to C, and Defendant B is a person who was employed in D Workers' Union around May 2004 and was promoted to the head of D Workers' Union around September 2013 and worked as a member of D Workers' Union EF from that time to that time, and retired from office in accordance with the above decision of settlement of fraud related to employment of D Workers' Union.
1. The Defendants’ co-offendered Defendants, using the fact that the recruitment process of D labor union was unsatisfyed, failed to receive money from those who want to subscribe to D labor union by deceiving themselves as if they could subscribe to D labor union through expenses. Defendant B, as if he had worked in D labor union and was able to recommend them as D labor union members when using their friendships with D labor union members, and Defendant A conspired to receive money from the victim as if he could be employed as d labor union members by using the above Defendant B’s influence.
Accordingly, the defendant A, around November 9, 2018, has "B" the victim I in the H coffee shop located in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Busan, as a result of the D's labor union. Thus, the defendant A can be employed as a union member upon the request of the person concerned with the D's high-ranking relationship through B.
In order to request, the amount is about 45 million won.
If necessary, the certificate of loan shall be written.
Around November 10, 2018, Defendant B introduced Defendant B as if he were to work as a captain in Dnono, and Defendant B would have been employed as a member of Dno, and Defendant B would have the victim work as a member of Dno, and Defendant B would have the victim work as if he actually worked as a captain of Dnono.