Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment has become final.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 14, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Labor Standards Act in the Changwon District Court's Msan Branch's imprisonment with prison labor for one year on August 22, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 22, 2013. On February 7, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act as a result of the violation of the Labor Standards Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 15,

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant A is an individual who, from November 1, 2010 to September 16, 2013, operated a block manufacturing business unit (main) for manufacturing vessels in Dab block E, and Defendant B is an individual who, from April 20, 2012, runs a franchis subcontractor who receives a contract for the volume of equipment necessary for block production from the said Note E from November 201 to September 16, 2013.

Defendant

A around September 2012, when the enemy accumulated, and it is difficult to operate the (ju)F due to failure to pay the quantity to Defendant B, G, H, I, and J, it is believed that the payment of the unpaid quantity would be exempt from the obligation to pay the quantity if the substitute payment is made by pretending that it is the overdue wages. At that time, Defendant B requested that “the quantity subcontractor would not be required to make a substitute payment, but if he would be entitled to receive a substitute payment if he is a F, he would be able to receive the substitute payment by receiving the substitute payment and appropriate it for the amount of the substitute payment.” After accepting it, Defendant B expressed that Defendant B would submit false data corresponding to it if Defendant B applied for the substitute payment.

Accordingly, Defendant B submitted an application for fact-finding, such as bankruptcy, etc., stating the false content that Defendant B worked in the Gwangju Regional Employment Center at the 1245-dong Ordinance on March 5, 2013 and retired from office around May 31, 2012, and Defendant A received the written statement of fact-finding, such as bankruptcy, etc. at the women’s balance office of the Gwangju Regional Employment and Labor Agency located in Simri-dong 111-1 around June 5, 2013.