A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a CMW car.

On December 30, 2014, the Defendant operated the said car on December 30, 2014, and changed the course to the first way in order to keep the road prior to the Ansan-si Korea Electric Power Corporation from the Gangnam Elementary School to the territorial intersection.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care not to change course when it is likely to impede normal traffic of other vehicles driving in the direction of change.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of running as it is, the Defendant shocked the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s BMW car into the left side of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle of the victim D (W, 53 years old) driving along a one-lane to the territorial intersection.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim D, on the victim D, such as cerebral spathy, spathal and tensions, and tensions, in detail as detailed in need of treatment for about three weeks. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim F (56 years of age) who is the passenger of the affected vehicle, such as the pipe, spathum, tension, tension, and cerebral spathy, etc. of the part requiring treatment for about three weeks. However, the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s request for a breath test as prescribed in

2. On December 30, 2014, at the same place as Paragraph 1, around 01:47 on December 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) caused a traffic accident; (b) stated that G, who was on the same line with the intent to conceal the fact that he/she was driving in the CMW car; and (c) stated that G, who was on the same line with the intent to conceal the fact that he/she was driving; and (d) led G

Therefore, the defendant was found to have caused a traffic accident by driving by G to the police officer of the Ansan Police Station who called to the place around that time.