Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid next shall be revoked.
The defendant.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to AMW car (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to B low-priced car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
나. 원고 차량은 2012. 11. 3. 09:15경 부천시 원미구 도당동 부천로1154길 주식회사 한국외환은행 도당점 앞 편도 2차로 도로의 2차로를 따라 진행하던 중 그 좌측 전방의 1차로를 따라 진행하던 피고 차량이 원고 차량보다 조금 앞선 지점에서 우측 방향지시등을 켠 상태에서 1차로로 차로를 급히 변경하면서 곧바로 위 도로 우측의 이면도로로 진입하였고, 그 과정에서 원고 차량의 좌측 앞범퍼 부분과 피고 차량의 우측 뒷문짝 부분이 충돌하였으며, 그 충돌로 원고 차량이 밀리면서 위 도로 가장자리의 보도턱을 충격한 다음 정지하였다
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
On November 23, 2012, the Plaintiff paid KRW 11,800,000 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle damaged by the instant accident.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff asserts that the accident of this case was wholly caused by the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle, and the defendant asserts that the negligence of the driver of the plaintiff vehicle in this case is at least 30%.
B. The Road Traffic Act provides that "the driver of any motor vehicle shall not change course when it is likely to impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which he/she intends to change course of his/her motor vehicle" and "the driver of any motor vehicle shall not change course" in Article 19 (3) of the Road Traffic Act.