logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.10.06 2013가단78825
채무부존재확인
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s KRW 2,019,802 against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its amount from June 28, 2012 to October 6, 2015.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff entered into a mutual aid agreement with Nonparty B and C private taxi (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) with the content that the Plaintiff compensates for the damages related to the accident during the operation of the vehicle.

B. B, around 09:40 on June 27, 2012, around 09:40, a traffic accident occurred that, while driving the instant vehicle at a two-lane radius from the front side of a city-based multi-purpose apartment at the window in the Changwon-si, the front side of the luxa at the center of luxa to the center of the luxa, the front vehicle did not see that the front vehicle driven along the instant vehicle while driving the instant vehicle at a two-lane radius.

(C) The “instant accident” refers to the following: (a) the Defendant: (b) was hospitalized in the D Hospital from June 27, 2012 to July 18, 2012; and (c) was hospitalized in the back of the instant vehicle by passengers with salt and tensions in the lux; (b) the lux of the lux; (c) the lux of the luxin’s salt and tension; (d) the lux of the luxin’s salt and tension; (c) the lux of the lux; and (d) the Defendant was hospitalized in the D Hospital from June 27, 2012 to July 18, 2012; and (d) received outpatient treatment at the D Hospital and Eluxian. On July 24, 2013, the Defendant was hospitalized in the left-hand lux of the lux; and (d) the left-hand lux of the lux of the collision (hereinafter referred to as the instant case”).

He was under the influence of the former and the latter, and received the latter, the latter, the latter, the latter, the latter, the latter, the latter, and the latter, the latter, and the latter, and the latter, the latter.

E. After the instant accident, there were no abnormal dogs in the two parts of the hospital and in the Hau CT performed by the hospital to the Defendant.

F. At the time of physical appraisal on April 15, 2014, the Defendant, at the High University Uniform Hospital, seems to have shown that the Defendant seems to have strawed up to the left-hand straw up to the shoulder, and applied to the straw up to the string of the string, but the Defendant complained of these symptoms, but the straw up to the right-hand side of the 3-4 trend at the string, CT and MRI shooting, and the decline of the straw up of the string of the 5-6 trend.

arrow