1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 23, 2018, the Plaintiff was an employee of the Plaintiff Company B, and was involved in the accident where the cable lines from the air conditioner off at the entrance of the first floor of the Seoul Northern-gu C market was opened.

B. As a result, the Plaintiff received the approval of medical care for “infection dump dump, tensions, tensions, and tensions, sump dump, and tensions” from October 23, 2018 to November 26, 2018, and provided medical care (35 days for outpatient treatment).

C. On November 16, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an additional injury and disease application with the Defendant on the ground that the “satisfing to the front line,” which caused the satisfying of the front line,” and that “satisfying to the front line, 4-5 drilling-100,00.” However, on November 26, 2018, the Defendant issued an additional injury and disease non-approval disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that “satisfying to the front line, 4-5 drilling-100,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000

Accordingly, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for review with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Committee. However, on January 30, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee on April 22, 2019, but the said Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for review on July 18, 2019.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 6, Eul evidence 1, the purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had received medical care with the approval of the medical care for the “satise salt pans, tensions, tensions, and other fingers,” but the Plaintiff continued to have pains on the left-hand shoulder, sheshesheshes and sheshes and shes off. Accordingly, on November 12, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the E Hospital as “the ratum ratum ratum ratum ratum ratum ratum rats on the left-hand shoulder,” etc.