logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.03.07 2018고단8968
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as if he sells a low-end vehicle at a lower price, concluded a contract with the victim, and, on the grounds that there was an amount of additional payment, which is not mentioned at the time of the contract, gave up the contract, and made the customer buy a vehicle with a low-end vehicle with no intention to purchase it at a low price, thereby having the customer buy it at a low price.

Accordingly, around February 12, 2018, the Defendant reported a false advertisement to the victim D, who found that “the Defendant sold the numberless cargo vehicle at KRW 3.4 million,” and entered into a sales contract with the victim to sell the above salary at KRW 3.4 million, and made a false statement to the victim that “the Defendant shall pay an additional amount of KRW 14 million to receive the above salary at KRW 3.4 million,” and the victim who demanded the cancellation of the contract cannot cancel the contract without paying the above 30% of the above amount of the salary at penalty, because the conclusion of the contract was completed. On the other hand, the purchase of another vehicle shall not be paid a penalty or penalty.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to sell the above-mentioned vehicle to the victim, concluded a sales contract for the above-mentioned vehicle from the beginning, and concluded a sales contract for the above-mentioned vehicle with the same method, and concluded a false statement as if there was any price to be additionally paid on the vehicle, and made it false to have the victim waive the contract and purchase and replace the other vehicle to the victim requesting the cancellation of the contract, and then, the Defendant was a plan to sell the

The defendant deceivings the victim as such and caused the victim to purchase the E E E-cub car on the same day.

arrow