A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

As a member of the secondhand shop B, the Defendant is obligated to make a false statement as if he/she were sold at a low price, to enter into a contract with customers, and to make an additional payment at all times not mentioned at the time of the contract.

The purpose of this study is to give up the above contract with the vehicle that is a vehicle with a serious or serious problem, and to let customers purchase the vehicle with no intention to purchase it at a low-end vehicle with no intention to purchase it.

Accordingly, on October 13, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D at an underground parking lot of the C Complex in the Gyeonggi-do, stating that “The victim may exchange with a vehicle of 10 million won equivalent to the market value of the victim, and with a vehicle of YzK,” and concluded a sales contract with the victim with the victim to show the bent vehicle at the above place, exchange with the fents vehicle with the fents vehicle, and then concluded the sales contract with the victim, and then the victim made a false statement to the effect that “The gent vehicle of gents under the contract needs to be more than 84 million won for the vehicle of gents and the remaining 74 million won for the vehicle of gents under the contract and the vehicle acquisition procedure has been completed.” The Defendant made a false statement to the victim requesting the revocation of the contract.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to exchange the above bents vehicles and Alphe vehicles, and concluded a sales contract for the above bents vehicles from the beginning with the foregoing method, and concluded a false representation as if there was any price to be additionally paid, and concluded a false representation that would inevitably cause the victim to waive the contract and purchase another vehicle to replace the victim requesting the cancellation of the contract, and then, the Defendant was a plan for sale at a price higher than the normal market price as if the market price of

The Defendant is the victim as above.