logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2015.09.11 2015고정56
산림자원의조성및관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant reported a forest management plan to the Southern City Mayor, and, from the end of October 2014 to the end of the Southern City, etc., cut over 30% of the forest trees that grow up to C in the course of growing trees in the Namwon City B, etc., notwithstanding the need to cut trees, the Defendant violated the conditions of permission, such as felling 50% of the forest trees, and cut off the registered standing timber volume by 229.4 cubic meters.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Location map of illegal forest damaged areas, photographs of illegal forest from destruction, and current status of survey of illegal forest damaged areas;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes that accept reports on forest management plans;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 36 (1) of the Creation and Management of Forest Resources Act applicable to facts constituting an offense and Articles 74 (1) 3 and 36 (1) of the Creation and Management of Forest Resources Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although it is recognized that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not a large amount of excessive felling standing timber due to a violation of the permitted conditions, the defendant's error is recognized in its entirety and it is against the depth. The defendant seems to have been excessively cut due to the negligence that the defendant neglected the field supervision of the lumbering, and the fact that the defendant does not seem to have committed the crime of this case in a planned manner is considered as favorable to the defendant, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the order, taking into account all of

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow