logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.09.07 2017고정688
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 2 million won, and by a fine of 1.5 million won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was in the fifth executive branch of the Korean Government Metal Trade Union C Branch (hereinafter referred to as the “C branch”), and was in the D branch of the C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “C”), and Defendant B was working in the E branch of the C branch while serving in the E branch of the C branch, and was sent from the sixth executive branch to the F branch as the candidate for the head of the F branch.

On November 11, 2015, the 6th executive branch election of C branch, the candidate of G, F, and victim H H, as a result of the 1st voting conducted on November 24, 2015, G and F entered the 7th election, which was conducted on November 27, 2015, and H were elected as the 6th executive branch.

Defendant

A, prior to the above election, following the employment fraud case that iced the friendship with H prior to the occurrence of the above election, intended to spread false information for the purpose of influencing the above election and slandering H, and Defendant B, in the above election process, had raised a negative perception of the victim I, who visited H as a candidate for the secretary general of H’s office in the election process, and had expressed a view to spreading false information by increasing the number of times of leave of absence due to the industrial disaster in order to influence the above election.

1. On November 18, 2015, Defendant A, at the office of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, U.S., with a view to slandering the victim H, even though the victim H was unrelated to employment expenses and was not accused of a complaint or accusation in relation thereto, the Defendant’s name was adjacent to the employment expenses of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch

1.3 Kakao Stockholm sent false comments to the effect that “C” was sent to 100 members of the C branch office.

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering the people, the Defendant posted a false fact openly through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim H.

arrow