logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.21 2017가단24463
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff: (a) against the Defendant, the public official in charge of the issuance of the certificate of the seal impression to B, upon applying for the issuance of the false name certificate to the Defendant’s resident service center; (b) verified the forgery of the resident registration certificate by comparing C’s photo registered with the certificate of the seal impression and C’s photo attached with the certificate of the resident registration certificate at the time of presenting the forged certificate; (c) neglected to do so with the duty of care to verify himself/herself; and (d) neglected to issue one copy of the certificate of the personal seal impression under C to his/her name in his/her name in his/her name in his/her name; (c) on April 8, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Daejeon District Court for the payment of KRW 132 square meters prior to E, 3,140 square meters from the date of the foregoing certificate of the personal seal impression to KRW 206 billion from the date of receipt on April 8, 2013; and (d) the Plaintiff’s obligation to receive the Plaintiff’s property damages from the Plaintiff’s office.

In addition to the plaintiff of this case and the defendant, the common plaintiffs and the co-defendants at the time are omitted.

In September 4, 2015, the above court is insufficient to conclude that the public official belonging to the defendant issued a certificate of personal seal impression to a person who assumes false name C.

arrow