Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are punished by death penalty.

The Defendants conspired to use the “F Hospital operated by the Victim E in Ansan-si on May 17, 2016, the 14:50 on the day of Ansan-si, the day of May 17, 2016,” which is operated by the victim E, and the Defendant used at will without returning the part of the equipment such as the ultra-wave video diagnostic apparatus in use by the victim, even though

I asserted that they enter the above hospital and that they have stolen within the hospital, "h,h," and "C" while they are viewed as patients.

All the parts of this case.

“Along about 10 minutes of the victim’s hospital operation operation by force, such as intending to see sound, see the original department, main fact, atmosphere room, etc. of the above hospital, and booming the disturbance, etc., by means of force, the victim’s operation of the hospital was hindered.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E, G, H, and I;

1. Application of the statutes governing the arrest of flagrant offenders;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 314(1) and 30 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendants bearing litigation costs: Determination on the Defendants and their defense counsel’ assertion under Articles 186(1) main sentence and 187 of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel asserted the elements for the establishment of the hospital. ① Defendant A her act with a police officer in order to check goods owned by the Defendant A at the hospital, taken a death in the hospital, and went out of the hospital immediately pursuant to the victim’s provision. ② Defendant B was outside the hospital with a police officer, and did not enter the hospital, and ③ Defendant B did not have entered the hospital with a police officer, and claimed that the time at the hospital was excessive.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence adopted and examined by the court, the instant facts charged can be fully acknowledged.

(1) A victim and the victim.