logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2020.08.21 2019누13075
국가유공자상이등급심의의결사항취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. In addition to the reasoning of the judgment of the court citing the judgment of the court of first instance, “the developments leading up to the disposition of first instance” and “2. Whether the disposition of this case is legitimate” and “the Plaintiff’s assertion” and “B. related Acts and subordinate statutes” (including the attached Form cited in the corresponding part) are as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (from the first to the fourth nine parallels and the last 1 to the sixth 10th parallels), and thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

1. The second five pages of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be " June 16, 2017" and " June 19, 2017."

(2) Each "non-influence" in the third, 15, 16, 18, and 21 of the judgment of the court of the first instance shall be raised "non-influence".

2. A part after the final judgment of the first instance;

C. 1) The Plaintiff was examined by the Daejeon Veterans Hospital on October 16, 2006 (the age of 57 at that time) around the time when the instant wound (urine) was recognized as actual aftereffects of defoliants by B birth.

At the time, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a mtild NPDR with a minor influoral catal catal catal catal catal catal catal catal catal catal (No.

(B) The Plaintiff was diagnosed on August 2017 (the age 68 at that time) at the Chungcheongnam University Hospital, at the time of filing an application for a re-determination of a trial with the purport that it is a minor influoral urology urology (hereinafter “mtild NPR”). The Plaintiff was examined on August 18, 2017 (the age 0.1 and 0.02 of the urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine. C) on August 18, 2017 (the age 68) by the Daejeon Veterans Hospital.

At the time, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with non-duplicated urology NPR and MaMD, and was measured with 0.1 of Malian and 0.02 of Malianal urology. The Plaintiff was the court of this Court.

arrow