(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.01.12 2016고단1692

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.01.12 2016고단1692

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1692"

1. Fraud;

A. On August 2015, the Defendant obtained the consent of the victim C by stating that “The Defendant may repay the loan to the victim within one month if he/she gets a joint and several surety, because it is not good credit to obtain the loan because he/she needs to pay money.”

Accordingly, on August 18, 2015, the Defendant entered into a loan transaction contract with the victim as a joint and several surety, with a loan of KRW 7 million from the loan of the same Dorain, KRW 7 million from the loan of the Dorain, KRW 7 million from the investment of the C&B B B, KRW 7 million from the loan of the investment, and KRW 3 million from the social loan of the Dorain on the 24th of the same month, respectively.

However, in fact, the Defendant borrowed bonds with the intention to use the borrowed money from the lending company as a gold for the purpose of private sports discussions, and there was no intention or ability to exempt the victim from the obligation of joint and several sureties by repaying the loan within one month.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and caused the victim to bear the joint and several liability for the total amount of 24 million won of the loan, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to that amount.

B. In the crime of December 2015, the Defendant did not repay the loans of the lending company as stated in the A, and was demanded by the injured party who was instructed to demand the lending company to repay the loans promptly. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant did not pay the loans to the lending company in the name of the lending company up to December 2, 2015, and around 106, the Defendant paid the loans to the lending company in the name of the lending company at a financial institution with a lower interest rate than the lending company and paid the loans to the lending company in the name of the lending company in the form of a loan company.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, facts are many defendants.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.05.25 2016고단206

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.05.25 2018고단567

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.11.08 2018고단2205

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.02.08 2017고단1166

-청주지방법원 2017.01.18 2016고단2104