logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.05.01 2014고단215
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving Category B Engines.

On November 4, 2013, 16:24, the Defendant continued to turn to the right from the right to the right from the right to the right to the right to the right of the Dog-ri University, Dog-ri, the Dog-ri, the Dog-ri, the Dog-ri

The location was set up a non-protection line sign, and at the time the victim C(48 years old) driven by the victim C(48 years old) is proceeding in line with the new one-lanes from the right side to the right side, and thus, the driver engaged in driving service has a duty of care to accurately manipulate the steering gear and the operation of the system and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went without being able to do so, and brought the front part of the driver's seat in front of the victim's driver's seat before the driver's seat.

Thus, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence that caused the victim C to suffer injury, such as the diversification of cage cages at the victim E (the 48 years old) of the damaged vehicle, which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, and at the same time and place, destroyed the video strawing system to cover KRW 2,035,00,00 for repairing the victim’s rocketing car at the cost of repair, and damaged the video strawing system at the crossing owned by the military authorities in the territory of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A survey report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, and on-site photographs of a traffic accident;

1. A certificate of damage diagnosis;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a written estimate for insurance repair costs, written estimate, and written estimate;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 268 of the Road Traffic Act, respectively.

arrow