1. The portion of the instant lawsuit claiming compensation for losses in agriculture shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant 48,713.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name - Business name: B (hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant - Project operator: Public notice of approval of an implementation plan: Notice C (referring to public notice of change to F on June 11, 2012, D, July 2, 2013, E, and December 2, 2013) of Pyeongtaek-si on June 11, 2012

B. The Plaintiff owned the land indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant lands,” and the obstacles indicated in the separate sheet No. 2 on the land and the ground surface (hereinafter referred to as “each of the obstacles in this case”).

C. The Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”) on December 18, 2013 - Subject matter of expropriation: Each of the instant land and obstacles - Date of expropriation: February 1, 2014: Compensation: The amount of compensation: (a) based on the arithmetic average of the results of each appraisal conducted by Samil Appraisal Co., Ltd. and Gaion Appraisal Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”) (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”) (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”) on each of the instant land based on each appraisal conducted by Samil Appraisal Co., Ltd.; and (b) the amount of compensation of KRW 1,172,958,50; and (c) KRW 1,173,333 of compensation for obstacles; and (d)

D. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on July 17, 2014 (hereinafter “instant ruling”): Compensation - Based on the arithmetic average of the results of each appraisal by the central appraisal corporation and the virtual appraisal corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as “appraisals on the objection,” hereinafter collectively referred to as “appraisals on the objection,” and collectively referred to as “appraisals on the acceptance and appraisal,” and collectively referred to as “appraisals on the acceptance and appraisal,” the sum of KRW 1,232,95,700, and the sum of KRW 203,333,00,000, and the sum of KRW 1,233,163,03,03, and the amount of compensation for the obstruction [based] was not disputed; evidence Nos. 2 through 4; evidence No. 1-4, No. 1-7, and the purport of the entire pleadings; and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and appraisal are erroneous in the appraisal by deeming each of the lands of this case as the master land, and neighboring similar land.