beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 24, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year for violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju Prison on July 26, 2010.
Around April 2012, the Defendant agreed to open and operate a call architecture under the I hotel located in G and Suwon-si H, and that he/she is responsible for and responsible for the interior works of the call architecture, and that the lease of stores, clothes, storage facilities, and restaurants located in the call architecture will proceed with the above G.
① The Defendant did not own any property, and ② on September 24, 2009, the Defendant did not pay the surcharge of KRW 71,500,000,000,000 that was sentenced to the charge of violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch branch on September 24, 2009. ③ The said interior capital was insufficient and the construction was eventually not carried out due to the shortage of the said interior capital, and eventually the said G invested an additional amount of KRW 150,000,000,000 from the victims, as follows.
1. On June 2012, the Defendant proposed a business of running an adult entertainment room by stating that “The Defendant would have made a lot of money to have a legitimate adult amusement room,” at his room located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 301, the Defendant would receive KRW 20 million from monthly income if he/she invested KRW 150 million. Nado 100,000,000,000 won, and distribute the profits to 6 (victim: 4 (Defendant).”
However, the Defendant was unable to meet the purpose of the construction cost as above, and there was no sufficient ability to invest in the adult entertainment room business. Thus, even if the Defendant entered into a real estate lease agreement with the victim for the adult entertainment room business, there was no plan to pay the balance. Even if the Defendant received money from the victim, it was thought that the money was appropriated to the said call text construction.
Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.