beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B and C jointly share KRW 35,500,000, and Defendant B with respect thereto from December 23, 2015.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition (1) Defendant B is a broker who runs the brokerage business under the trade name of “D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office (hereinafter “Defendant brokerage office”),” and Defendant C was actually operating the Defendant brokerage office as the broker assistant of Defendant B.
(2) On July 2012, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s brokerage office and met Defendant C. Defendant C introduced to the Plaintiff, a rental house leased by Defendant E on September 1, 2012, “F, 304 Dong 704 (hereinafter “the instant apartment house”). The fact that Nonparty E, a lessee of the instant apartment, only moved in the vicinity of the instant apartment, but did not take a director at least 40 km, which is a requirement for sub-lease under the Rental Housing Act, as well as at least 62,00,000, which is a requirement for sub-lease under the Rental Housing Act. Since the Plaintiff obtained a loan of KRW 52,00,000 from the Defendant’s Military Saemaul Bank of Korea for the instant real estate LH Corporation, the lease deposit recovered from the LH Corporation was substantially KRW 10,000,000,000, and the lessee of the instant apartment house was not aware of the requirements for the instant apartment loan to the Plaintiff.”
(3) As of September 1, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract with the instant apartment from September 22, 2012 to September 30, 2014 with a deposit deposit of KRW 65,00,000, and the lease contract from September 22, 2012 to September 30, 2014. The Plaintiff paid KRW 59,000,000 to E for the remainder on September 21, 2012.
(4) After that, the Plaintiff was residing in the instant apartment, but E did not pay the amount of money borrowed as security for lease deposit to the instant apartment, and Nonparty Gun Military Saemaul Savings Depository filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on July 9, 2014, and received a favorable judgment against the Plaintiff on around August 2014, and issued a favorable judgment against the Plaintiff.
(5) Defendant C, as above, is true E.