The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. Around October 10, 2010, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the victim G, D, and the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul E 711 Dong 701, which provides for the lease deposit of 270 million won and the lease term from November 29, 2010 to November 28, 2012 at the F office located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, for the apartment owned by the Defendant, and around October 10, 2010, the Defendant bears a heavy burden of interest to be paid monthly since the sum of the maximum debt amount of the right to collateral security established on the above apartment is equivalent to 97,57 million won and the amount of interest to be paid monthly by the victims is high, since the auction on the apartment was launched due to the lack of interest at a harsh financial institution and the risk of being unable to return the deposit due to the commencement of the auction on the apartment, and the director at the same time tried to cancel part of the lease deposit of the above apartment building as the lease deposit and return it to the lessee's.

However, at that time, the Defendant had a debt of 75 million won per annum for the card loan with interest of 17% per annum other than the debt revealed in the register of the above apartment register. At that time, the income of the Defendant was in a situation where there was a growing number of disputes, such as card theory, continuously because it is not possible to cope with interest and living expenses to be paid every month to financial institutions, and real estate brokerage offices are operated.

Around that time, the large enterprise was closed and did not have any specific property because it was in attendance or denial in the large enterprise as a university lecturer, and there was no apartment building in the pressure-driven Dong.

Furthermore, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement as above and repaid part of the obligation to borrow the above apartment from a financial institution as collateral with the victim’s deposit.