logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.05.15 2013구단10246
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 17, 2004, the Plaintiff, who became a member working on board, was on duty and was diagnosed as “self-cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”) by passing through the wooden IC while working on the wooden-Seoul route around 15:53 on December 9, 2012 while driving on the Mapo-Seoul route, and was in marine on the side and on the Mana bridge, making it difficult for the Plaintiff to stop the vehicle on the side, and was not able to receive the diagnosis.

B. Accordingly, on December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant. On February 12, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the rejection of medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) based on the judgment of the Gwangju Regional Disease Determination Committee on the ground of the judgment by the Gwangju Regional Medical Disease Review Board, that “The applicant, as a result of review of the content of his/her duties, work period, medical record, the doctor’s opinion, opinion on advisory opinion, etc., appears to have been adapted to the applicant’s long-term work type and method of the dispatch, and it is deemed that excessive increase in work volume and special changes in the duty before the date of the disaster are not verified, and there is no proximate causal relation between the career and work.”

C. On May 7, 2013, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed a request for review on May 7, 2013.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 3, 7, and 14, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff joined the gold highest speed as a member working on September 17, 2004 and worked for two-day work and one-day work hours were 16 hours a day off. The plaintiff mainly worked for the wooden-Seoul Routes and the Bapo-In Incheon Routes for a long time and long distance driving, and the vehicle operated by the plaintiff was worn off in the 202 or 2004.

In the case of the Seoul Air Office, the relationship used by many people has mainly taken a break in the vehicle, and Seoul on December 5, 2012, the snow volume of 7.8cc.

arrow