1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 15, 2012, the Plaintiff was employed in Es.S. Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “S. Co., Ltd.”) and performed the duties of sales management in the section of the department.

On April 13, 2013, the Plaintiff was at work, and 11:00, while working, and her cigarette was dried, and then was sent to the hospital after being her own mind, and was diagnosed as the “sculphopon and so on” (hereinafter “the instant wound”).

B. On April 19, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits regarding the instant injury and disease.

On July 18, 2013, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application for medical care on the ground that “The result of reviewing the content of duties, period of service, medical records, video data, doctor’s opinion, advisory opinion, etc., is confirmed as an applicant’s disease. However, the Defendant’s application for medical care is not approved on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between duties and the injury on the ground that it is judged to be worse due to the individual’s natural progress, such as brain/competing, etc. due to insufficient occupational or stress

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). 【The ground for recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s 2, 3, and Eul’s 1, 2

2. On July 15, 2012, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion accumulated as a victim while serving approximately 2 hours and 30 minutes each day in an extremely heated or heated environment. However, the Plaintiff was unable to take sufficient rest. Around three weeks prior to the occurrence of the instant injury, two persons engaged in the instant injury, thereby incurring occupational burden, and the instant injury was caused.

3. Whether the disposition is lawful;

(a) as shown in the Attachment of the relevant statutes;

B. The following facts and medical treatment are comprehensively taken account of the following facts in the evidence duly admitted prior to the fact finding: Gap evidence Nos. 2 and Eul evidence Nos. 2 through 6; the result of the request of this court for the examination of medical records to the head of the Jeonbuk University Hospital Hospital; the fact-finding reply to the fact-finding inquiry by the court of this case