Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of seven thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a mutual entertainment business in the name of “C”, and Defendant B is an employee of the mutual beauty room in the name of “D”.

1. Defendant A is not a person handling narcotics.

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

A. From March 17, 2008, at the Incheon city's supply port located in Jung-gu Incheon city, Jung-gu, Incheon city, 2850, two pieces of tobacco containing 0.5g horse marijuana, each of which is granted free of charge from the person who was on the face of the local divers' name, from among the travel to the Thailand, entered the tobacco lock, and kept it in the Defendant's official approval color between the two vehicles.

B. On September 28, 2012, the Defendant entered into a tobacco package containing 0.5g marine marijuana, each of which is granted free of charge from an employee on his/her name in the local liquor of the Philippines, among the tripss at the above Incheon State’s supply port, and kept the two pieces of tobacco on a tobacco package, and kept it in the between the said Ecoos car tracks.

2. Defendants’ joint criminal conduct

A. At around 21:00 on July 8, 2008, the Defendants: (a) opened to the Moelel with trade names in E-si, E-si, E-si; (b) put about about 1g of marijuana, which Defendant A kept as referred to in the foregoing paragraph 1(a), into the pipe made of a pipe for smoking, and smoked with each other as smoking.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to smoke approximately 0.5 g of marijuana.

B. On January 22, 2013, around 22:00, the Defendants: (a) administered to a single telecom with trade name near F in E, E, E, and (b) smoked approximately 1g of marijuana containing two pieces of tobacco stored by Defendant A as referred to in the foregoing paragraph (b) in the same manner as the foregoing paragraph (a).

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to smoke approximately 0.5 g of marijuana.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of the maternity appraisal of A by the National Scientific Investigative Research Institute;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: