logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.20 2013나63508
보험금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the court's explanation is the same as the ground of the judgment of the first instance except for addition or modification as follows.

The following contents shall be added between 12 and 13 of the judgment of the first instance:

E. Thereafter, on April 2, 2014, the Plaintiff changed the three-party 13 of the judgment of the first instance court of "(3) of "(13) of "(4) 13, 2014 from F of the medical corporation affiliated with the medical corporation of the Macheon Medical Foundation to F of the medical corporation," the following facts: (1) 13 of the judgment of the first instance court of "(4) 1 to 4, 6, and 10 of "(including the ground for recognition) ; (2) 1 to 4, 6, and 10 of "the result of the fact inquiry into the medical corporation of the party members of the medical corporation of the Macheon Medical Foundation," into "the purport of the entire pleadings".

The fourth 2-4 of the judgment of the first instance court changed the following facts to “A evidence 5, A evidence 7-2, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, the result of the first instance court’s entrustment of the examination of medical records to Seoul Hospital of the first instance court, the result of the fact-finding of the first instance court’s first instance court’s fact-finding on the Gnecheon National University of Seoul University, and the result of the fact-finding on the party members’ 1,000 Seoul University Hospital.”

The 4th 16th 16th 2th 16th 16th 201 was changed to “The results of the examination of the medical records on the head of the Seoul Hospital of the first instance court” as “the results of the examination of the medical records on the Seoul Hospital of the first instance court.

No. 14-15 of the first instance court's 6th 15th 15th 14th 15th 6th 6th 15th "not necessarily requires the diagnosis of brain ties I63 to the diagnosis of brain cerebral cerebral Bribery and brain cerebral cerebral Bribery, and the opinion of blood transfusion is not necessary."

arrow