logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2015.01.14 2014누212
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment which cited the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Plaintiffs are basically repeating the same argument in the first instance court. The first instance court’s determination is justifiable even if the Plaintiff considered the allegations and reasons that partially supplemented in the first instance court, and examined the contents of Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 9 (including numbers, if any) newly submitted, regarding the result of the request for the appraisal of medical records to the Seoul Hospital of the relevant court.]

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow