Seoul High Court 2008Nu17693 (Law No. 23, 2009)

Examination Corporation 2007-0026 (2007.05.30)

(Recompetence to Trial) Whether the disposition of exclusion of the retirement bonus paid without the provision on the payment of benefits was made;

(Summary of the Supreme Court Decision 200Da13349 delivered on May 2, 2008).

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Although examining all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, it is clear that the appellant’s grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition by