1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. The Defendant’s person eligible for veteran’s compensation against the Plaintiff on January 14, 2019.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 16, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was diagnosed as a “national subdivision of a dead body for death (hereinafter “instant wounds”) during military service and was discharged from military service on January 9, 2017, and filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on February 2, 2017 with the Defendant on the basis of the instant wounds as the applicant for registration.

B. On January 14, 2019, the Defendant rendered a disposition against the Plaintiff that does not meet the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “each of the instant dispositions”) on the ground that the instant wounds cannot be recognized to have been caused or aggravated due to the performance of military duties (hereinafter “instant dispositions”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. In light of the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s difference in the Plaintiff’s assertion occurred during military service without relation to the king or genetic factors; (b) the difference occurred after the lapse of a considerable period after the wound entered the instant accident; (c) the occurrence or aggravation of the wound occurred due to excessive performance of duties after the entrance into the instant accident; and (d) the Plaintiff neglected to observe and observe several times, and even if he could have been able to assess and treat the cause diseases; and (c) the difference occurred rapidly due to the occurrence of a sudden aggravation of the progress of military duty or education and training; and (d) the revocation of the decision corresponding to the person of distinguished services to the State who has rendered distinguished services to the State; and (e) the revocation of the

B. The facts of recognition 1) - The results of the Plaintiff’s admission to the hospital and the results of the draft physical examination - The diagnosis conducted at the training center after entering the training center on April 14, 2012 (the entrance to the training center on August 16, 2015) - The examination conducted at the training center after entering the training center (the entrance to the training center on November 23, 2015), - the examination conducted at the training center (the entrance to the training center on November 23, 2015) -