1. On May 26, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition that rendered against the Plaintiff was revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 25, 2013, the Plaintiff (B) entered the Army and discharged on March 24, 2015. On September 14, 2015, 2015, the Plaintiff (B) filed an application for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State for the instant difference, asserting that “In the instant case, the Plaintiff filed for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on September 14, 2015, the Defendant filed for the registration of the instant difference by asserting that “the instant difference was caused by frequent shock training and happiness during military service.”

B. On May 26, 2016, following the deliberation of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant rendered a disposition equivalent to the person who rendered distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “disposition corresponding to the person who rendered distinguished service to the State”) and the disposition corresponding to the person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “the disposition corresponding to the person eligible for veteran’s compensation of this case”) on the ground that the injury in this case was found to have caused proximate causal link with the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national security, etc., or caused occurrence or aggravation of the causal link with other duties or education and training. Therefore, the Defendant did not meet the requirements for a person

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 4 and 5 (including provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the main claim of this case

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the instant accident occurred when 15 months elapsed since 15 months elapsed since her entering the military, although the Plaintiff did not have to have a emerculation, and that the frequent emerculation training and emercation training had an impact on the outbreak or aggravation of the instant accident, and thus, the Plaintiff’s emerculation training, etc., directly related to the national security of the State or the protection of the people’s life and property, constitutes “direct cause,” which led to the occurrence of the instant accident, or that the instant accident rapidly aggravated due to such reason.

(b).