The crimes of the 2015 senior 1097 defendant's judgment are punished by imprisonment for 8 months and 2016 senior 55 cases.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On January 15, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime in the Sungnam branch support, which became final and conclusive on January 23, 2014.

【Criminal facts 【2015 Gohap1097’s 1097 】 The Defendant, as the representative director of G Co., Ltd. mainly engaged in the housing construction implementation business, etc. located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF, carried out the business of constructing and selling the shopping mall located in the Gu and Si/Gun (hereinafter “Gu and Si/Gu”) on the ground that H is an executory company.

1. On August 21, 2008, the Defendant is expected to build commercial buildings on the NF on the road in the Gu-U.S., Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Gu-U.S.-U.S.-U.-U.S.-U.S.-U.-U.S.-U.S.-U.S.-U.S.-U.S.) at the victim M (hereinafter “Gu-U.S.-U.-U.S.-U.-U.) office in

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

Although the Defendant could not properly proceed with the “former project”, even though he did not have any intent or ability to pay money according to the agreement, the Defendant deceiving M as such and received KRW 30 million from M around that time.

2. The Defendant, around September 5, 2008, at the O Model EM office in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 2008, had P delegated by the Defendant, as delegated by the Defendant, the victim Q Q, who has the right to implement the IG construction project (hereinafter “Gumi-si project”). Thus, the Defendant would have the right to vicariously execute commercial advertising.

“Along with Q 1.2 billion won,” false statements were made to the effect that “a contract was concluded for advertising agency services with Q 1.2 billion won.”

The Defendant was unable to properly proceed with the old and previous project, and even though Q did not have the intent or ability to exercise the right to vicariously run the commercial building advertisement according to the agreement, the Defendant deceiving Q as such and received KRW 50 million from Q as deposit money of the above service contract around September 5, 2008.

3. The defendant around September 2, 2008 part.