Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was the former Si E from 2000 to 2013, and Defendant B was a person engaged in livestock farming in the former Si F.

On March 8, 2010, from around December 2011, the Victim Korea Rural Community Corporation (hereinafter “the Victim Korea Rural Community Corporation”) conducted a project to remodel farmland in which large-scale farming complexes to cultivate high income crops are created by preventing habitual flood damage to the farmland and by using dredging soil generated from a river, using the dredging soil generated from a river. In accordance with the relevant provisions, the victim Korea Rural Community Corporation (hereinafter “the Victim Korea Rural Community Corporation”) paid 470,000 won in the case of two sexual rains, one of which is called for operating income and compensation for transfer of livestock based on three months in accordance with the relevant provisions, and 20,000 won in the case of dispatching.

Compensation for losses to livestock farmers may be paid only to those who have incurred business losses due to the relocation, etc. of the place of business due to the implementation of public works, and they shall not be paid compensation by fraud or other improper means.

Defendant

A on August 11, 2009, at the H office located in Gumi-si G, the purpose of which was to attend a briefing session for the “farmland remodeling project” project conducted by the Gumi Kimcheon-si, Korea Rural Community Corporation, and to hear the explanation that a livestock farmer included in the project site would be paid a maximum of KRW 2,00,000 for each two losses, and to receive compensation unlawfully. On September 21, 2009 and September 28, 2009, if he did not actually take over 50 U.S. 50 copies owned by Defendant B, he was actually taken over and reported the fact that he received ownership by transfer, and until the compensation for losses was paid, he was willing to raise at the stable of Defendant A, which is located in Gumi-si, U.S., Kimcheon-si, and Defendant B did not receive compensation under the condition that he would receive the compensation until he was aware of the fact that Defendant A would not receive compensation.