logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.12.02 2014고단3659
사기
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who operated a house of “D” in Seodaemun-gu Seoul from around 2002 to February 201, and a house of “F” in Seodaemun-gu Seoul from around 2007 to around 201. A. The Defendant is a person who operated a house of “F” from around 2007 to around 201.

Around November 2010, the defraudation of borrowed money, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would repay the loan in 100,000 won per month to the Defendant who is an employee of the victim-based limited company G (hereinafter “victim”) (hereinafter “victim”) who is an alcoholic beverage supplier, “G is engaged in alcoholic beverage transactions and secure a majority of customers who sell alcoholic beverages in this region.”

However, at the time, the Defendant had a loan and unpaid amount of KRW 35 million for an existing liquor supplier, and even if he received a loan from the victimized company, he did not have the intent or ability to repay the loan and unpaid amount of KRW 60,000,000 for monthly income and food materials unpaid amount of KRW 60,000,000 for personal debts.

Nevertheless, the Defendant entered into a loan agreement with the victimized Company on November 25, 2010 and transferred KRW 20 million to the new account in the name of I under the name of I on the loan, on December 10, 2010, and transferred KRW 20 million to the new account in the name of the Defendant on December 10, 201, and received KRW 10 million on April 29, 201 under the same name as the new account in the name of the said I on April 29, 201.

Accordingly, the Defendant received a total of KRW 50 million from the victimized company and acquired it by fraud.

B. Around November 25, 2010, the defrauded of alcoholic beverage prices, the Defendant said that “The Defendant would supply alcoholic beverages in the G and pay the prime liquor price to H, a member of the victimized company, who is an alcoholic beverage supplier.”

However, at the time, the Defendant had a loan and unpaid amount of KRW 35 million for an existing liquor supplier, and the monthly tax and unpaid amount of food materials was equivalent to KRW 60,000 and KRW 20,000,000. In the event of a competitor, sales have been reduced rapidly since the mid-201, and thus, alcoholic beverages are supplied from the victimized company.

arrow