logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.07.01 2015고단276
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant operated a restaurant with the trade name “D” from August 2, 2011 to September 2012 in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si.

On June 14, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to G, the vice president of the victimized Company F office located in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, stating that “The Defendant will pay 30 million won to G, who is the vice president of the victimized Company, within one year, and be supplied with alcoholic beverages equivalent to 2 million won from F.”

However, at the time, the Defendant was liable to the National Bank for KRW 30 million, KRW 45 million to H, KRW 13 million to J, KRW 45 million to J, KRW 20 million to the Future Savings Bank, KRW 263 million to (ju), and KRW 463 million to pay the principal and interest of the above Loan Agreement, KRW 103 million, and KRW 2703,00,000,000, KRW 100,000 to the above National Bank, KRW 39,60,000,000 per month, and KRW 450,000,000,000,000,000 won, and KRW 1,50,000,000,000,00 won, as it was difficult for the above Bank to pay the principal and interest of KRW 1,50,000,00,00,00 won per month, and KRW 1,500,00,00.

Nevertheless, on June 14, 2012, the Defendant entered into a loan and alcoholic beverage supply contract with the victimized Company to receive a loan of KRW 20 million or more from the victimized Company and KRW 20 million or more per month, and received KRW 20 million from the victimized Company to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant on June 15, 2012, and transferred from June 14, 2012 to the same year.

8. Until June 16, 198, received alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 5,679,400.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property of the victimized company by deceiving G, which is an employee of the victimized company.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow