beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant Social Welfare Foundation B shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. From 2005 to 2005, Defendant A is a person operating a “social welfare foundation B” comprised of “B special childcare centers”, “B special childcare centers,” “E Day Care Center,” “facilities for promoting disabled children’s potential and rehabilitation,” and “social enterprises,” which are “social enterprises for creating jobs of vulnerable class.”
Around August 2008, the Defendant, who violated the Infant Care Act (B Special Child Care Center related to the Child Care Center), committed a crime of fraud and violation of the Infant Care Act (B Special Child Care Center) by deceiving a public official in charge of the above child care center driver as if the F were working as a driver of the above child care center even though F did not have worked as a driver of the vehicle in the above child care center, to receive personnel expenses subsidies from the victim.
Accordingly, around August 208, the Defendant prepared documents as if he was a driver of the vehicle in the above Special Child Care Center B at the above Special Child Care Center B, and applied for a subsidy for personnel expenses for the above F to public officials in charge of female viewing, and received a subsidy for personnel expenses for the above F from the victim to July 2012, the Defendant received KRW 272,849,650 in total for 48 times as shown in attached Table 1, as shown in attached Table 1, from the above date and time to July 2012.
As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received property from the victim at the same time, and received false subsidies.
B. Fraud (E Daytime Protection Center related to the E Daytime Protection Center) the Defendant would be granted subsidies for personnel expenses to employees of the said Daytime Protection Center by deceiving public officials in charge of the said Daytime Protection Center as if G and H had not worked as employees at the said Daytime Protection Center even though G and H had not worked as employees at the said Daytime Protection Center.