logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2019.07.25 2019가단105854
토지인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the 2,860 square meters of paddy-si B paddy-si, it connects each point in the separate sheet No. 1 to 4, and 1.

Reasons

1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition may be found either in dispute between the parties or in each entry or video of Gap evidence 1-6 (including a serial number), by integrating the purpose of the entire pleadings.

On October 5, 2011, the Plaintiff was designated and publicly announced as the Bogeumjari Housing District for the instant project as F publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. On June 12, 2015, the Plaintiff received the registration of ownership transfer from G on June 2, 2015 with respect to the land of 2,860 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. The Defendant owned a wood net dog on the ground, which connects each point of 1 to 4, and 1 of the annexed drawings among the instant land, and owned a wood net dog on the ground, which connects each point of 3.24 square meters on the ground (hereinafter referred to as “the part”) of the instant land, each point of 15.18 square meters on the ground, which is located in the part of 15.18 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “the part of the instant land”), and a wooden net dog on the ground, which connects each point of 9.65 square meters on the ground (hereinafter referred to as “the part of the instant land”) in line with each point of 9.65 square meters on the ground (hereinafter referred to as “the part of the instant land”), and occupied the land of the instant land, which is 136 through 13-27 square meters on the ground, in turn, and occupied the land of the instant land from G (hereinafter referred to as “the part of the instant land”). In addition, the portion of the instant land is occupied of the residential structure (hereinafter referred to be referred to as “the part”).

C. On October 16, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 11,564,00 to him/her as compensation for losses for the instant vinyl after consultation with G, and paid KRW 2,397,00 to the Defendant as compensation for losses for each of the instant checks, etc. on May 26, 2017, following consultation with the Defendant.

arrow