All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in the misapprehension of the judgment of the court below that found Defendant A not guilty on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence to prove that the Defendants conspired with the victims as if they had such intention or ability, thereby under the agreement, they did not have the intent or ability to cause the interior works, and there was no intent or ability to pay the material price. Defendant B was well aware of such circumstances, but the Defendants conspired with the victims, thereby deceiving the victims of the contract deposit and intermediate payment, and deceiving them of the fact that there was insufficient evidence to prove the receipt of the material, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court below is as follows: (a) it is acknowledged that Defendant A borrowed money from his son, mutual savings bank, etc. and used it as construction cost or material cost; (b) the above Defendant appears to have made efforts to complete the interior construction and pay the material cost; and (c) Defendant A and his me asked at the court below that “When determining the scope of the specific amount or time-period, there is any enemy in which Defendant B participated”, “A is memory, and Defendant B was partially involved (as recorded in the trial record No. 96 of the trial record), and S asked at the question that “A is not a witness, but a young Defendant is not a witness,” and there is no question between Defendant B and the public trial record No. 143 of the trial record.”